Furthermore, people who are starving for basic necessities can threaten the peace of the world. Al Qaeda was allowed to grow in Afghanistan because the Afghan government did not have the financial and military might to prevent terror cells from forming. Therefore, in my opinion, the fortunate nations should aid to the poorer nations according to their willingness, status and laws.
Places like Afghanistan have seen terrorist groups flourish. Another important thing is we should not forget all the people in the world are part of one community, the human being.
To quiet his critics, many of the feedback I give students certain tools and practices alsup, These disasters are some of the reasons why other countries are having trouble with their life.
For instance, in the UK government granted a fund of 1 million dollars to Yemen citizens in order to eradicate the scarcity of food and create new schools to bring reform in the education.
As a consequence, developing nation will be turned into developed one in near future. We have to be united. A wealthier country would mean a correspondingly higher level of education among its citizens.
In conclusion, I believe that it would be less likely to see any improvement in developing nation economy and status without the cooperation of wealthy countries.
They can invest money, conduct educational courses and other measures to increase the quality of their lives.
Previous Next Should richer nations help poorer ones. To begin with, the world should be considered as a family. Should wealthy nations be required to share their wealth among poorer nations. Wealthy nations should provide local governments with aid and guidance to offer their nation with better life standards.
This result in many consequences: Saturday, 27 May To put everything in a nutshell, supporting the poor countries to make a better life for their people will cause several pleasant results not only domestically but in some cases internationally and more importantly, it all is justified by humanity.
Fortunately, our professional writers are ready to help you almost for free. Privileged nations such as those who belong on first-world countries have an abundance of funds, thus, giving away food and supporting education can be easily be done.
Even despite the fact that there are a lot of conflicts on our planet such as the war between the Russian Federation and Ukraine, civil war in Syria and so on.
However, too much help may be a bad thing. Besides, other nations are lucky to have better positions that are not prone to disaster and also rich in natural resources.
Having wealthier neighbours will also help to spur local economic growth. Most of those developing nations are living under the poverty line, and in my opinion, wealthy nations have the ability and the responsibility to help them.
Thus, it is obvious that legal entity is chargeable for taking care of their natives. Help cannot be rendered unconditionally as nations may lose the incentive to develop long-term solutions to their problems. Conclusion Therefore, we really think that direct charity is useless.
If wealthy nations share a certain portion of their wealth to the poor nations, it will be a great help to initiate new businesses and investment for a poor nation. This essay outlines two perspectives from diametrically opposite angles.
Do not forget that there are a lot of countries, which have nuclear missiles and we are almost sure that our planet will be destroyed in the instance of the Third World War. On the one hand, giving poor countries food, resources or money without getting anything in return, such as goods or services, is bound to remove any motivation for them to develop and to do something to improve their situation.
It has long been a concern on who should give out help to the poorer sectors of society. This situation can even culminate in wars. The first important point I would like to mention is the fact that most of the poor economies are suffering from lack of having enough facilities and resources in the fields such as education and food.
Their governments lack financial means to improve their living. This essay will look at the arguments for and against helping poor countries.
There are many reasons for helping poor countries. First of all, there are humanitarian reasons. Like individuals who give to charity, many countries feel it is their religious, social, or moral duty to help people in other countries who are suffering from famine, drought, war, or disease.
Essay on Should Richer Nations Help Poorer Nations Week 5 Eco Should Wealthy Nations be helping Poorer Nations? I would say that if the wealthy nations want to give grants to the poorer nations then that should be there choice. Should wealthy nations be required to share their wealth among poorer nations by providing such things as food and education?
Or is it the responsibility of the governments of poorer nations to look after their citizens themselves? The wealthier, benevolent nations should and have been providing aid to the poorer nations.
This practice is appropriate for an array of reasons. Poor nations tend to be breeding grounds for crime and terrorism. Peter Singer’s argument focuses greatly on the nation that citizens of rich nations can with ease help poor nations, without causing any financial burden, therefore, helping those in need should be done.
Should wealthy nations be required to share their wealth among poorer nations? Posted on May 17, by UkEssayNowcom Disclaimer: if you are a student in the United States of America, you have to write essays and other papers from time to time.Should wealthy nations be helping poorer nations essay